Normans uncut: A look at Anglo-Romanesque ornament

St Alban's Abbey, 1080s. Early Norman - big, plain, and a little big dodgy

The tower of St Alban’s Abbey (Hertfordshire), 1080s. Early Norman – big, plain, and a little bit dodgy

The Norman Conquest of 1066 brought more than just a new regime to England, it brought a new style: the Romanesque. The Normans proceeded to flatten every single one of the Anglo-Saxon cathedrals and rebuild them on a heroic scale. Their first churches went for scale above anything else. However, the crowning towers of these triumphal buildings had a nasty habit of falling down. Among many more, the bell tower of Old Sarum (Salisbury) blew down 5 days after the cathedral was consecrated in 1092, Ely famously tumbled down on to the Gothic choir in 1322, and Chichester lost its south-west tower in 1210, its north-west in 1635 and its central tower as late as 1861.
The Normans realised in the twelfth century that they were better off taking their time and the sculpture for their big thick walls became richer and richer. Many of the habits of ornament such as chevron or “zig-zag” are peculiar to England, and affected the whole course of English architecture. Of course, some of their ideas were better than others…



____________________________________________

Earls Barton, Northamptonshire

Earl’s Barton (Northamptonshire). Blind arcading, c.1150

Why do we put this zig-zag stuff on like every arch we carve, Master John?

Chevron? I’ll give you one guess

It’s pretty easy?

Ding ding


____________________________________________

Kilpeck  church (Herefordshire), 1130s or 40s

Kilpeck church (Herefordshire), 1130s or 40s

So did you guys finish that corbel table yet

Oh yes

Let’s have a look round then


KONICA MINOLTA DIGITAL CAMERA Sorry this one was my first go, my bad


KONICA MINOLTA DIGITAL CAMERA

Well, that’s okay, I do like these wide-eyed monsters though

John did these, he’s good at them


KONICA MINOLTA DIGITAL CAMERAAh, a sheela-na-gig, my favourite

Yes, we remembered you like them

Those dames eh

Hmm, yeah


KONICA MINOLTA DIGITAL CAMERAIs this that Lamb of God I asked for over the east window

Yes

It looks like a horse

John is not as good at animals


KONICA MINOLTA DIGITAL CAMERAWhat is this

It is a puppy and a bunny

What are they doing on my new church

Being best friends

It’s not the sort of thing I expect out of you guys, frankly

Well I thought it just balanced out that bald demon lady pulling her vagina open



____________________________________________

Iffley, Oxfordshire

Iffley church, west portal (1170s or 80s) – photo by Martin Beek

Master John, why do we carve these funny little owl faces on every doorway we do these days

Beakheads?

Whatever they’re called

Guess

Are they some sort of reminder of the sin that besets all Christian souls in this dark fallen world of temptation

No try again

Is it because they are basically just zig-zag with eyes

Quite, now, get carving


____________________________________________

Tickencote (Rutland). Chancel arch Photograph by Richard Croft - From geograph.org.uk.

Tickencote (Rutland). Chancel arch
Photograph by Richard Croft – From geograph.org.uk.

So how many elaborately carved orders would you like in the arch at the end of the nave

Five

We usually do about three, just to give you an idea

Yes but I want five

You do realise that is going to be a really big arch

Yeah well I have big ideas and one of them is that this arch needs to be HUGE

Well if it ends up not quite round and slumping in the middle don’t think we’re coming back to fix it

Don’t forget the beakheads



____________________________________________

St Leonard's Priory, Stamford

St Leonard’s Priory, Stamford (Lincolnshire), west front – very late Romanesque, 1180s or 90s

So how would you like your west portal

Well I imagine it will have all that zig-zag stuff round the arches like usual

Ah yes but regular common-garden chevron is totally yesterday’s news

What do you recommend then

We can give you on the central portal an order of angled chevron, with syncopated-hypenated lozenge work in the second order and then a third order with hypenated chevron with a ringed-shaft and then of course crocket capitals in the French style atop the engaged shaft-work

That sounds expensive

Do you want everyone to remember you still have an apse round the back

Ugh fine, room any beakheads though I love those little guys

What is this the 1130s



____________________________________________

Burton Agnes (East Yorkshire). Photograph by Evan McWilliams

Burton Agnes (East Yorkshire). Chancel arch capital. Probably c.1200. Photograph by Evan McWilliams

Did you finish carving the arch capitals yet this church is getting consecrated tomorrow

Dah-dah

Uhh

You see I improved on the scallop capital design by putting these little lines at the top, so they look like flowers ready to bloom

Umm

Do you think the priests will like them

Son let us go and never speak of this again



____________________________________________

If you enjoyed this Norman sculpture, then there is plenty more at the Corpus of Romanesque Sculpture of Britain and Ireland, where you can search to see what carving there is in your area. You can also volunteer to go around photographing this stuff so they can catalogue every surviving example in the British Isles to try and understand what was going on with this wonderful enigmatic artistic style.
The photographs are taken by me, except Tickencote which is by Richard Croft, Iffley which is by the appropriately-named Martin Beek, and the capital at Burton Agnes was shown to me by Evan McWilliams to much merriment.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Normans uncut: A look at Anglo-Romanesque ornament

  1. Outlier Babe

    Oh, brother. You guys and your focus on your dangly bits. (Not so dangly ’round that one column, I’ll grant you.)

    Enjoyed your humor again, of course, and also enjoyed the surprises for me in this post:

    1. Stone arches built for sh#t? You’re kidding! I had no idea!

    2. Goofy-looking cartoonish-buffoonish dog and cat gargoyles? I feel…disappointed. Almost offended, for some reason I don’t understand–something to do with my sense of aesthetics, I think. Gargoyles are grotesque, but also attractive. That cat and dog are not, to me.

    I recently made a quite snotty and now exposed as also quite-ignorant comment on someone’s post about a stone-carver’s convention. I haughtily criticized the low quality of the workmanship displayed (inadvertently asymmetrical, for example), and I remember mentioning specifically how ridiculously buffoonish the facial features of most figures were–implying they’d never cut the olde mustyrd back in the day. I wuz rong.

    3. WTFrig kinda female figure is THAT? Were the they who did those allowed to do them? Gee. I didn’t know that. I know the poetry was pretty open about sex, but that figure’s type of openness really surprised me, on a Christian church. How many figures exposing labia ARE there on Christian churches around Europe? Is this a fluke?

    Reply
  2. Bethan Davies

    Excellent, I think you would get on with me and my sister, avid fans of Norman arches, beak heads, animals etc (also bloggers!) We also amuse each other with thinking how the carvers might have talked about their work.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s